i think i am sure, you were in oldschool alliance, right?
- [#1] revenge of enclave (May 2003)
[#1] Prince of Anarchy (Jun 2003)
[#1] Tears of Rainfall (Jul 2003)
[#1] I Am Better of Alone (Dec 2004)
[#1] The Point of No Return (Jan 2005)
- [#1] revenge of enclave (May 2003)
[#1] Prince of Anarchy (Jun 2003)
[#1] Tears of Rainfall (Jul 2003)
[#1] I Am Better of Alone (Dec 2004)
[#1] The Point of No Return (Jan 2005)
Last round we where enemies, next round we probably wont be allies, I have better allies now. Maybe not better in the game but better in being an ally.
And last round you had so much land and practicly no defense, so I had to attack you. And I think we did good, I mean when I was 3,5k in acres I grabbed about 5k from you so that was cool. And as you said yourself you weren't really playing last round so what does it matter?
So it depends on the situation if we are friends or foes, unless you are holding a crudge now?
i have tried to explain things, but enclave is too stubborn to listen. if he wasn't really playing, i don't see why he is getting so upset. he likes to hold grudges. it is alright. chiel, if you guys want to start an alliance that would be cool.
"Knowledge is silver, the wisdom to understand it is gold."
specialy gweedo. the thing is not in game, thing is in trust. i don't trust you, my friends are trustful, no trust, no peace
chiel, i don't care, i also have allies so we will be able to kill each other
- [#1] revenge of enclave (May 2003)
[#1] Prince of Anarchy (Jun 2003)
[#1] Tears of Rainfall (Jul 2003)
[#1] I Am Better of Alone (Dec 2004)
[#1] The Point of No Return (Jan 2005)
> chiel, gweedo.
>
> specialy gweedo. the thing is not in game, thing is in trust.
> i don't trust you, my friends are trustful, no trust, no peace
>
>
> chiel, i don't care, i also have allies so we will be able
> to kill each other
>
> "Knowledge is silver, the wisdom to understand it is gold."
enclave: i told you my reasons for things. i told that it was going to happen. i even gave you an advanced warning so you could prepare. but when it all comes down to it, you hit my alliance first. how is that my fault for breaking the truce between us? you hit one of my members. do you not expect us to hit back? if you truly want to fight me and my allies next round, i am all for it, but know this: you are not going to be my primary target if you choose to go to war with me, link and insane needed to be stopped coming out of protection. that is what i am going to try to do. if you are so caught up in this little quarrel to give those two the round again, go ahead, but me, i am going to try to stop them, not play at being there little protectors.
"Knowledge is silver, the wisdom to understand it is gold."
Gweedo that's exactly what i am talking about, the trust is thing that can't be broken, you told you are going to atatck me coz you are bored. Trustful enough next rounds i will be bored, that's just it
Link and Insane , Macbeth and even Odin, proven that they are trustful enough, when i went 25k acres, Link and Insane didn't attack me, i was an easy target, but i am 100% sure they were even more bored playing with such lame ppl as you are.
Do you ever think i would go for that much land if i wasn't sure that i won't be attack by your alliance? i thought i have a trustful friend as a leader of your alliance. The pay.
- [#1] revenge of enclave (May 2003)
[#1] Prince of Anarchy (Jun 2003)
[#1] Tears of Rainfall (Jul 2003)
[#1] I Am Better of Alone (Dec 2004)
[#1] The Point of No Return (Jan 2005)
enclave: i am just as trustful as those other people are. i have allied with odin in the past, the same with you and macbeth. we had our separate alliances, but we agreed upon a truce between us so we could attempt to catch insane(gotta have goal, right?) the fact still remains that you attacked my alliance first. wouldn't that be you breaking my trust? you said he was helping out someone not in my alliance, so you attacked him. panic was not in my alliance, yet you attacked people in my alliance because panic was killing you. why were you hitting us, when panic was your true enemy. he said he was going to take you down. that was his goal. why did you take it out on my alliance and friends? the truth of the whole matter is that you broke the trust, not me. my allies only agreed to help panic, who is now a close ally of mine, because you started to attack us. the only person out of your alliance that i still respect is kinglan because he stayed out of it and didn't attack us, even though he easily could have. you broke the trust! i respect link and insane for not attacking you, that would be so hard because it gets boring at the top. there is nothing to do. if you have a response to thise, i would be interested in hearing it. i just thought people should know the truth.
"Knowledge is silver, the wisdom to understand it is gold."
He Gweedo, I was in your alliance and if I would have known of a truce with enclave I would never have joined the alliance. And he was so landfat that the first 25 in top 50 could have gained acres so I dont really see the problem of breaking truces and all, I started the round 2,5 weeks late and attacked enclave when I was not even in top 15
> yet you attacked people in my alliance because panic was killing you. why were you hitting us,
your members were hitting my members all the time, my smaller allies were asking for help for a long, and i said i can't do anything, we have a truce, I EXCUSED SOME OF YOUR DUMB ALLIES ATTACKING MY ALLIES.
> i just thought people should know the truth.
you thought you can make up the truth, i will jogde you next round, stop saying bullshit in forums.
- [#1] revenge of enclave (May 2003)
[#1] Prince of Anarchy (Jun 2003)
[#1] Tears of Rainfall (Jul 2003)
[#1] I Am Better of Alone (Dec 2004)
[#1] The Point of No Return (Jan 2005)
Next round should be fun, whenever admin decides to get around to starting it.